<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>inqk.net &#187; magazines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inqk.net/weblog/tag/magazines/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inqk.net/weblog</link>
	<description>There is no word mystering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:53:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Poor Cousin</title>
		<link>http://inqk.net/weblog/2011/628</link>
		<comments>http://inqk.net/weblog/2011/628#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 14:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Camilleri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web sites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inqk.net/weblog/?p=628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 24 March, Google UK &#38; Ireland (of all places) launched a website for a magazine it has produced called Think Quarterly. According to the website, Think Quarterly is a magazine which Google distributes to some of its business partners in order to &#8216;communicate&#8217;. Why Google would want to do this is not clear to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 24 March, Google UK &amp; Ireland (of all places) launched a website for a magazine it has produced called <a href="http://thinkquarterly.co.uk/" title="Visit the Think Quarterly website.">Think Quarterly</a>. According to the website, Think Quarterly is a magazine which Google distributes to some of its business partners in order to &#8216;communicate&#8217;. Why Google would want to do this is not clear to me but why Google <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9Fxp3HK6DI" title="This is actually kind of cool.">does a lot of things</a> isn&#8217;t clear to me either.</p>

<p>While the magazine is not something you can pick up in a store, Google is saying that it intends to publish all of the articles from the magazine on the Think Quarterly website and you can download PDF and EPUB copies of the first issue that you can then read on your iOS/Android tablets.</p>

<p>The thing that&#8217;s interesting about Think Quarterly to my mind is that, for a company that is roundly regarded as not having much taste when it comes to design, the magazine looks fantastic.<sup id="fnref:1"><a href="#fn:1" rel="footnote">1</a></sup> The layout is clean but with touches of visual flair here and there that encourage you to continue reading and, perhaps more importantly, assist in understanding the material.</p>

<p>All of which makes the website pretty disappointing. To be clear, the site is not ugly. And it&#8217;s not obviously a Google site. Definitely, it has style. No, the problem with the website is the way that the articles are displayed. Which is to say that you are able to read them and&#8230; that&#8217;s about it. Compare the lead story &#8212; an interview with Guy Laurence, the CEO of Vodafone UK &#8212; as it&#8217;s presented in the magazine with how it&#8217;s <a href="http://thinkquarterly.co.uk/01-data/executive-insight-guy-laurence/" title="Read 'Executive Insight' at Think Quarterly.">presented on the website</a>.</p>

<p>Again, it&#8217;s not that the presentation is horrible. It&#8217;s just that it has no <em>oomph</em>. There is none of the flair that accompanies the article as it&#8217;s presented in the magazine. What&#8217;s more, while you might at first think that the layout really isn&#8217;t that bad, when it&#8217;s repeated for <a href="http://thinkquarterly.co.uk/01-data/a-data-state-of-mind/" title="Read 'A Data State of Mind' at Think Quarterly.">article</a> after <a href="http://thinkquarterly.co.uk/01-data/fully-viral/" title="Read 'Fully Viral' at Think Quarterly.">article</a> after <a href="http://thinkquarterly.co.uk/01-data/open-for-business/" title="Read 'Open for Business' at Think Quarterly.">article</a>, it begins to get a little stale. More to the point, it evidences a complete lack of imagination for the design of the site. Kudos to Google for putting well-written content up there to be sure, but it&#8217;s a sad reflection on where we are with web design that this would be considered a pretty good magazine website.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s tempting to say that one shouldn&#8217;t be surprised that Google has not put the same amount of attention to detail into the website as it has to the magazine (particularly when it has no financial incentive to do so). This is fine if Think Quarterly were the only publication afflicted with this problem. Unfortunately, it&#8217;s not. See <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.time.com/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.nationalgeographic.com/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.spectator.co.uk/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.spiegel.de/">here</a> (and so it doesn&#8217;t look like I&#8217;m just picking on magazines: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.latimes.com/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/">here</a>). This isn&#8217;t a case of Think Quarterly&#8217;s designers lacking imagination. It&#8217;s a case of web designers in general lacking imagination. It&#8217;s a fundamental inability, more than 20 years after the web first started and over a decade since the Internet went mainstream, to create layouts and designs that match the quality of those in print.</p>

<p>I am not a hater. There is great work being done &#8212; some of it <a href="http://www.20thingsilearned.com/home" title="Read '20 Things I Learned About Browsers and the Web'.">by Google</a>, some of it <a href="http://craigmod.com/journal/kickstartup/" title="Read Craig Mod's article entitled 'Kickstartup'.">by people who are not magazines</a> and some of it by magazines that <a href="http://methodandcraft.com/" title="Visit 'Method and Craft'.">only exist on the web</a>. It&#8217;s 2011. We can stop being the poor cousin. We just need to release our imaginations.<sup id="fnref:2"><a href="#fn:2" rel="footnote">2</a></sup></p>

<div class="footnotes">
<hr />
<ol>

<li id="fn:1">
<p>This may be because the design was outsourced to a firm called <a href="http://www.thechurchoflondon.com/" title="Visit The Church of London website.">The Church of London</a>. Still, props to you Google UK &amp; Ireland for knowing what you can do and what you can&#8217;t do.&#160;<a href="#fnref:1" rev="footnote" class="backlink">&#8617;</a></p>
</li>

<li id="fn:2">
<p>Where by &#8216;we&#8217; I mean &#8216;you, designer&#8217;. Go team!&#160;<a href="#fnref:2" rev="footnote" class="backlink">&#8617;</a></p>
</li>

</ol>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inqk.net/weblog/2011/628/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask Amazon</title>
		<link>http://inqk.net/weblog/2009/382</link>
		<comments>http://inqk.net/weblog/2009/382#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Camilleri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inqk.net/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love the design of the new Foreign Affairs website. They have this little thing where they use Flash to render the headlines of their articles. I realise we&#8217;re all supposed to hate Flash but it looks so nice. They&#8217;ve got just the right amount of line-spacing and even though articles are spread out across [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the design of the new <a href="http://www.foreignaffairs.com/" title="The website for Foreign Affairs magazine.">Foreign Affairs</a> website. They have this little thing where they use Flash to render the headlines of their articles. I realise we&#8217;re all supposed to hate Flash but it looks so nice. They&#8217;ve got just the right amount of line-spacing and even though articles are spread out across multiple pages, the advertising is tasteful enough that I don&#8217;t mind seeing it again.</p>

<p>In fact, I love the design of the new Foreign Affairs website so much I decided I&#8217;d subscribe to the magazine. They have a paywall in place and I was getting frustrated at not being able to read what sounded like the most interesting articles. Also, I don&#8217;t believe there&#8217;s some magical money-making machine that ensures good writing gets paid for. So I thought, you know what? I&#8217;ll do it. I&#8217;ll subscribe.</p>

<p>If you live in the U.S., a subscription to Foreign Affairs magazine costs US$32. If you live outside of North America you pay US$32 for a subscription and US$35 for delivery.</p>

<p>I suppose we shouldn&#8217;t be surprised. Printing is cheap these days and Australia is a long way from the United States. And US$67 is hardly the end of the world. But I don&#8217;t like paying for things I don&#8217;t need and I didn&#8217;t want the printed version of Foreign Affairs; I just wanted to be able to access the website. Surely something could be done. I thought my question was pretty straightforward:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Hi</p>
  
  <p>I&#8217;m not sure who the right person to ask is. I&#8217;d like to subscribe to Foreign
  Affairs but I live in Australia.</p>
  
  <p>The main reason that I want to subscribe is to have full access to the
  website. To subscribe with an Australian address will cost more in shipping
  than the cost of the subscription itself (currently US$35 v US$32).</p>
  
  <p>Is it possible only to subscribe at the US price and simply not have the
  physical magazine shipped to me?</p>
  
  <p>Cheers</p>
  
  <p>Michael.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>This was the response:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Ms. Camilleri,</p>
  
  <p>We do not offer kindle subscription. Please contact Amazon.com for further assistance. If we can be of any other assistance, please let us know.</p>
  
  <p>Thank you for subscribing to Foreign Affairs.</p>
  
  <p>Sincerely,</p>
  
  <p>Pete Stone
  Email Customer Service</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Stellar job there, Pete. In three lines you managed to call me a girl, tell me to go and ask someone else for help subscribing to your magazine and then thank me for subscribing when my question was about how I could subscribe.</p>

<p>Still, I kept my cool:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Dear Pete</p>
  
  <p>I&#8217;m not actually after a Kindle subscription; what I&#8217;d like to know is if there is some way to subscribe without having the magazine sent to Australia. I presume I could simply put a U.S. address in and send my issues to someone else but, in the interests of saving paper, I thought perhaps it would be possible to subscribe and simply have the magazine not sent.</p>
  
  <p>Cheers</p>
  
  <p>Michael.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The response:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Ms. Camilleri,</p>
  
  <p>We are sorry, we do not offer digital subscriptions. If you wish to avail only a online subscription and no print version, please contact amazon.com.</p>
  
  <p>Thank you for your interest in Foreign Affairs.</p>
  
  <p>Sincerely,
  Scott Shelton
  Email Customer Service</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Two things: (1) Seriously, when did Michael become a woman&#8217;s name? (2) What is it with you guys and Amazon?</p>

<p>I realise there&#8217;s a danger at extrapolating from personal experience. What happened to me is possibly a one-off. Certainly it&#8217;s not the cause of the decline in print media. But it&#8217;s hard not to see it as emblematic of a struggle for companies to adjust to the idea that people might want to pay for the content without the dead trees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inqk.net/weblog/2009/382/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/15 queries in 0.032 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 358/395 objects using disk: basic

Served from: inqk.net @ 2012-02-12 12:12:11 -->
